Search

Search Cadence Lab

Product · AI Experience

A confident answer isn’t the same as a trustworthy experience.

An AI assistant gives a polished answer based on an old policy. The customer acts on it, reaches a human, and has to explain everything again. The output looked good. The experience failed. And Medallia’s 2026 research found only 7% of consumers forgive AI more than they forgive a person. AI Experience designs what people should expect, what the system can do, where human judgment belongs, and how the organization recovers when AI gets it wrong.

Where it breaks

AI friction starts when people can’t judge the system.

People need more than a fast answer. They need to understand why AI is involved, what it knows, what it can do, and where accountable human help begins.

01

People can’t tell when AI is involved

Generated responses, recommendations, summaries, routing, or automation shape the interaction without making the system’s role clear.

02

The answer sounds more certain than the evidence

Fluent language hides old sources, missing context, conflicting records, inference, or uncertainty that could change the decision.

03

AI stands between the customer and real help

People must repeat themselves, prove the system failed, or navigate another loop before reaching someone who can take responsibility.

What teams receive

Leave with an AI experience teams can own.

The outputs define the intended human relationship, the complete service path, the required controls, and how the organization will evaluate real use.

  1. 01

    AI role and experience rules

    The human need, intended benefit, AI role, exclusions, interaction rules, decision boundaries, accountable owner, and implications for delivery.

  2. 02

    End-to-end AI service blueprint

    The visible journey connected to data, models, tools, workflows, employees, policies, handoffs, exceptions, recovery, and operating dependencies.

  3. 03

    Interaction and handoff requirements

    Disclosure, context, evidence, uncertainty, controls, confirmation, accessibility, escalation, human support, continuity, and recovery behavior.

  4. 04

    Evaluation and governance plan

    Representative cases, quality criteria, experience measures, outcomes, review behavior, monitoring, complaints, incident triggers, owners, and review cadence.

How the experience moves

Follow the person from first expectation through recovery.

Test the complete situation, not just the AI response. The experience includes what happens before, during, and after the model produces an output.

  1. 01

    Expect

    Does the person know what AI will do?

    Need, channel, prior relationship, disclosure, AI role, expected benefit, alternatives, urgency, accessibility, and known limits.

  2. 02

    Interact

    Can the person make sense of the result?

    Response, choices, evidence, citations, uncertainty, correction, confirmation, refusal, accessibility, language, and interface behavior.

  3. 03

    Recover

    What happens when AI is wrong?

    Escalation, context transfer, complaint, correction, remediation, human support, incident response, customer outcome, and product learning.

What to examine

Measure what people experience and what the system causes.

A strong model score can’t prove the experience works. Evidence should connect the interaction to the data, workflow, human decisions, and real outcomes around it.

Human needs and expectations

Research, goals, context, mental models, trust, accessibility, language, prior experience, vulnerability, and the cost of misunderstanding.

Sources and model behavior

Data, retrieval, provenance, prompts, models, tools, variation, accuracy, groundedness, latency, refusals, limits, and prohibited outputs.

Customer and operating outcomes

Task success, effort, trust, access, fairness, service quality, resolution, capacity, rework, complaints, retention, risk, and unintended harm.

Trust should match the evidence

The goal isn’t to make AI feel human or earn blind trust. People should have enough information and control to judge the system’s role, limits, evidence, and the accountable organization behind it.

When it fits

Use AI Experience when AI changes a meaningful interaction.

This work fits when AI shapes how a customer, employee, patient, member, citizen, or partner gets information, makes a decision, completes a task, or receives support. It isn’t the right fit for a demo or an automation target that ignores accountability and recovery.

Start a FitCheck™

Related paths

Choose the next step based on what is still unresolved.

AI Service Readiness Review

A use case needs a readiness decision across workflow, data, human oversight, safeguards, adoption, measurement, and implementation conditions.

Explore AI Service Readiness Review

Experience Foundations

Teams need shared customer, journey, ownership, service, and measurement decisions before defining AI’s role in the broader experience.

Explore Experience Foundations

Agent Copilots

The experience supports an employee or specialist with context, recommendations, bounded actions, and accountable human judgment.

Explore Agent Copilots